Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Copy Edit Complete

Today I have approved and finalized the copy edits on my collection of stories, Traveling Sitting Still. I was very impressed by the quality of the editing, and David Bernardi at iUniverse has my thanks for a job well done. It is amazing that a manuscript I have sweated and bled over for the last three years can still contain so many tiny blemishes. I am confident that, now, the book will be blemish free.

It was well worth the additional four weeks production time.

Now we enter final stages of publication and I hope to have my book in hand by the end of the month. With luck, I'll have it by the time I celebrate my thirtieth birthday.

The collection is also under review by iUniverse's editorial board for possible inclusion in the Editor's Choice circle of books—a prestigious distinction.
 

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Japan

Today I pass the time reading
a favorite haiku,
saying the few words over and over.

It feels like eating
the same small, perfect grape
again and again.

I walk through the house reciting it
and leave its letters falling
through the air of every room.

I stand by the big silence of the piano and say it.
I say it in front of a painting of the sea.
I tap out its rhythm on an empty shelf.

I listen to myself saying it,
then I say it without listening,
then I hear it without saying it.

And when the dog looks up at me,
I kneel down on the floor
and whisper it into each of his long white ears.

It's the one about the one-ton temple bell
with the moth sleeping on its surface,

and every time I say it, I feel the excruciating
pressure of the moth
on the surface of the iron bell.

When I say it at the window,
the bell is the world
and I am the moth resting there.

When I say it at the mirror,
I am the heavy bell
and the moth is life with its papery wings.

And later, when I say it to you in the dark,
you are the bell,
and I am the tongue of the bell, ringing you,

and the moth has flown
from its line
and moves like a hinge in the air above our bed.


Billy Collins
 

Thursday, January 25, 2007

The Park on Sunday

Bees rise and fall
like carnival heads,
locomoting this ocean
of ugly clover flowers,
these droning Apoideans.

I rest on my island
of shade and green
grass.

There are others
in the park this Sunday—
throwing baseballs,
kicking soccer at a net,
bouncing screaming babies

on one knee,
as if sea sick
is better.

With no paper or pen
I am here only reading,
taking in a short
story before a novel
is begun.

But mostly I am watching
the bees dart up into
the air and down into
the clover, wondering
if I will remember this
on Monday.
 

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

My Space?

Big Oil, Big Brother Win Big in the State of the Union

by Greg Palast
January 23, 2007

There was that tongue again. When the President lies he's got this weird nervous tick: He sticks the tip of his tongue out between his lips. Like a little boy who knows he's fibbing. Like a snake licking a rat.

In his State of the Union tonight the President did his tongue thing 124 times—my kids kept count.

But it wasn't all rat-licking lies.

Most pundits concentrated on Iraq and wacky health insurance stuff. But that's just bubbles and blather. The real agenda is in the small stuff. The little razors in the policy apple, the nasty little pieces of policy shrapnel that whiz by between the appearances of the Presidential tongue.

First, there was the announcement the regime will, "give employers the tools to verify the legal status of their workers." In case you missed that one, the President is talking about creating a federal citizen profile database.

There's a problem with that idea. It's against the law. The law in question is the United States Constitution. The Founding Fathers thought the government had no right to keep track on a citizen unless there is evidence they have committed, or planned to commit, a crime.

But the Founding Fathers didn't imagine there were millions and billions of dollars to be made by private contractors ready to perform this KGB operation for the Department of Homeland Security, tracking each and every one of us to keep tabs on our "status."

These work databases will tie into "voter verification" databases required by the Help America Vote Act. And these will tie to the databases on citizenship and so on.

Will Big Brother abuse these snoop lists? The biggest purveyor of such hit lists is Choice Point, Inc.—those characters who, before the 2000 election, helped Jeb Bush purge innocent voters as "felons" from Florida voter rolls. Will they abuse the new super-lists? Does Dick Cheney shoot in the woods?

There were several other little IEDs (improvised execrable policy devices) planted in the State of the Union. Did you catch the one about doubling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve? If you're unfamiliar with the SPR, it is supposed to be the stash of oil we keep in case the price of crude gets too high.

Well, the price of oil has been horribly high but Dick Cheney, the official who sits on the Reserve's spigots, has refused to release the oil into the market.

More ... Instead of unleashing the Reserve and busting Big Oil's price gouging Bush will double the Reserve, which will require buying three-quarters of a billion barrels of oil. This is a nice $40 billion pay-out to Big Oil from the US Treasury. Compare this to the President's health insurance plan which will be "revenue neutral"—that is, have a net investment of zero.

But the $40 billion in loot the oilmen will get from us taxpayers for doubling the Reserve is nothing compared to the boost in the worldwide price of crude caused by this massive, mad purchase. While the Congressional audience didn't even bother polite applause for the reserve purchase plan, there's no doubt they were whooping it up in Saudi Arabia. Clearly, the state of the Saudi-Bush union is still pretty good.

But why end on a cynical note? I must admit I was moved by the President's praise of Wesley Autrey, a New Yorker who, last month, threw himself on top of a man who had fallen on subway tracks—and held him between the track rails as the train passed over them.

While the President properly acknowledged Autrey's courage in saving the man who fell on the subway tracks, Mr. Bush still did not explain why Dick Cheney pushed the man in the first place.


Greg Palast is the author of the New York Times bestseller: Armed Madhouse: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Class War. www.GregPalast.com
 

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Us

They made a statue of us
And it put it on a mountaintop
Now tourists come and stare at us
Blow bubbles with their gum
Take photographs have fun, have fun

They'll name a city after us
And later say it's all our fault
Then they'll give us a talking to
Then they'll give us a talking to
Because they've got years of experience

We're living in a den of thieves
Rummaging for answers in the pages
We're living in a den of thieves
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious

We wear our scarves just like a noose
But not 'cause we want eternal sleep
And though our parts are slightly used
New ones are slave labor you can keep

We're living in a den of thieves
Rummaging for answers in the pages
We're living in a den of thieves
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious

They made a statue of us
They made a statue of us
The tourists come and stare at us
The sculptor's mama sends regards
They made a statue of us
They made a statue of us
Our noses have begun to rust
We're living in a den of thieves
Rummaging for answers in the pages
Were living in a den of thieves

And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious
And it's contagious


(Regina Spektor, "Us," Soviet Kitsch)
 

Monday, January 22, 2007

Meet Barack


 

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Where You Were

At 7 a.m. your hair did not clog the bathtub. The drain was clear. The cracked, green sink was empty of your blush, your rogue, your blue mascara, just how I never wanted it to be. Your towel—the coarse, pink cotton that you would wash and re-wash, though it grew ragged and thin—did not hang from the rack. In the bedroom, your lilac shampoo still lingers on our—my—pillows, though that too is fading.

In the underwear drawer I found only my boxers, folded neatly along the seams, just as you left them last laundry day. I did not find one bra there, one pair of panties. Your mother took all of those, even the ones I thought I hid so well.

The police came too. They took your pistol. You had used it while I was away in San Francisco. They took your letter too, though I told them they hadn't the right. Two-Hundred and Fifty dollars bought them both back. I thought if I could read your loose, black scrawl once more I could understand, but I was wrong. I showed the gun to your mother, but she refused to touch it. "Evil," she said.

I, however, cannot stop touching its rigid, cool body. On the tip of the barrel, with my tongue, I can taste the salt of your sweat. I can taste the iron of your blood. My finger slips so easily into the trigger guard. I can almost feel your finger there, warm and quivering, pressed against my finger. Can you feel mine?

From where you are, can you feel me like I feel you?

I wonder if, where you are, you are still sweet. If you still laugh at silly jokes. If your nostrils still flare when you get angry. I wonder if the fine, dark hair on the back of your arm still stands when you are scared. I wonder if you still get scared, where you are. I wonder if you are still sad. If you still cry.

I know I do. I could never handle being alone. When I was seven, my dog died. Buddy was my best friend, but he had to leave. Mom said that God had called him back.

Did God call you too? Did you hear His voice?

I ask because I think I do now; He says I don't have to be alone. Sometimes, I think it's you talking to me. Sometimes, I think you're sorry. Some nights, I even think I see you. But you're gone.

Almost.

Your gun is still here. It is all I have left of you besides your guilt, which touches me where I am, as my love cannot touch you where you are.

Or where you were.


(by Lawrence Lawson)
 

Thursday, January 18, 2007

River Whiskey

"Well if the river was whiskey
and I was a diving dove,
well I would dive to the bottom
that's what I would do."

Muddy Waters
 

A New Kind of Eukaryote (revised)

Sometime around six million years ago a new breed of apes began to walk upright on the African savanna. No one is sure exactly why. Most likely the changing climate, which was transforming forests into plains, meant the earliest hominids found themselves in a new environment—one where standing upright brought with it important advantages: the ability to see predators and prey at greater distance, and thus survive. The four limbed locomotion which had served these apes for millennia in the trees was quickly becoming unsuited for travel in the emerging grasslands. This highly complex animal was the result of billions of years of evolution—from the earliest forms of bacteria and prokaryotic organisms to the eukaryotes which ultimately evolved into eels, bony fish, amphibians, reptiles, and, eventually, birds and mammals.

Evolution on this third planet, located in one tiny solar system revolving amid the celestial soup of an unremarkable elliptical galaxy, was a slow process. It was a process which could have just as easily never begun at all. But it did begin, thanks in part to this planet's fortuitous combination of characteristics: a prime location relative to the star it orbited; a liquid core; a tilted axis; a small, orbiting body of its own to create tidal pulls once water gathered on its surface.

Though it took billions of years for the first chloroplasts to come into being, and hundreds of millions more for those chloroplasts to pump out enough oxygen to create an atmosphere and an ozone layer (which ultimately allowed arthropods to follow plant life from water to land sometime around 500 million years ago), the stage was eventually set for life to flourish. And flourish it has. Through numerous ice ages and five mass extinctions, planet Earth has proven again and again to be fertile ground for life of all kinds, sizes, and capacities.

Over the next five million years the descendants and genetic cousins of the those first Australopithecines experienced a slow and sneaky process of genetic mutations and lucky breaks. Until, about 200,000 years ago (there is some debate about this date), the first Homo sapiens took this bipedal ape family to a whole different domain. With their massive brains—larger, by far, than any other primate before or since—their capacity for adaptation, their propensity for culture and language, and their unique openness to new ways of thinking (what anthropologists call "plasticity"), Homo sapiens was a formidable species indeed.

Yet they were young, and those of us who have descended from these prehistoric humans, are young too. Amazingly so.

The history of planet Earth is so lengthy that its nearly five billion years are often expressed as 24 hours. It's a trick only the brain of Homo sapiens could come up with, and it's a good way to understand the relative lengths of each geological and evolutionary stage. Using this analogy gives us perspective. We see that—if Earth's creation took place at midnight last night, and we chart the subsequent 4.567 billion years until midnight tonight (with each second accounting for 53,000 years)—modern humans have been around for only the last four seconds.

Our species is a very recent addition to the biomass of our planet. Many of our most important milestones barely measure on the planetary timeline. We began using fire on a regular basis, and for specialized functions, about 2 seconds ago (Homo erectus is usually given credit for first controlling fire over 1 million years, or about 19 seconds, ago). We first began experimenting with magic and religious practices .6 seconds ago. We reached the last uninhabited region of the world, the tip of South America, .2 seconds ago. Shortly thereafter—about 1.8 seconds ago—we abandoned our foraging subsistence and adopted agriculture. The two thousand years since the birth of Christ comprise a paltry .04 seconds on our planetary clock.

The timeline for advancements made since the industrial revolution, just 200 years ago, is hard to visualize given this perspective. The age of colonization and slavery, colonial independence from England, universal suffrage, two world wars, the nuclear age, civil rights, the space age, and the environmental movement, all are almost incomprehensibly small ticks on our 24-hour timeline. And the computer age is almost invisible.

Yet the impact of the crafty ape named Homo sapiens is anything but invisible. In most cases, we have had a dramatic and often devastating impact on Earth. In the last .0038 seconds we have directly or indirectly altered every ecosystem on the planet, destroyed countless species forever (one species each year at our current rate), and thrown the very health of the planet into a chaotic downward spiral. Our rate of population growth in just the last 100 years (.0019 seconds) exceeds every other vertebrate ever to have lived on planet Earth—and threatens to overwhelm it. A looming second nuclear age, global warming, the blight of mega-cities, our haphazard instigation of a sixth mass extinction, and quickly dwindling resources each pose significant threats to the continued existence of Homo sapiens.

What are we to conclude about such a remarkable evolutionary journey when it has brought us to this point? How should we, both as a species and as stewards of the planet, continue the legacy of not only our resourceful hominid ancestors but of life itself? What can we do, you and I, to ensure that the most noteworthy species ever to exist on this planet (and perhaps any other) does not participate in its own undoing? Finally, how do things change when we expand our perspective to include all life on Earth, even that which might one day develop on our planet—do we have a responsibility to those life forms?

This book will attempt to answer these questions by framing modern humans in a new light. When we become familiar with our own evolution—indeed, with the evolution of all life on Earth—we will better understand both our capacities and our limitations. But biology is only the starting point. As Homo sapiens have proven since their inception, the capacity for advancement is dictated not by genetics but by our capacity to imagine, to create, to communicate, and to share. Shaping the very thoughts we think is quintessentially human, and it is as capable of leading us astray as it is of creating a new and better way of life. It is this kind of thought revolution which offers us the chance to instigate a new kind of evolution. We have the chance to achieve, in a cosmic instant, the kind of cultural evolution which will—like the biological one we have already undergone—put every other species to shame, and propel humanity toward a bright future.
 

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Introduction: A New Kind of Eukaryote

This post has been revised and moved. The revised version can be read by clicking here.
 

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Poem Stew

government, agrees, expressed, chips, his, Moore’s Law, hopes, faster, Hewlett-Packard, Prime Minister, computing, nanowire, papers, heavy, Iran, crossbar, al-Faisal, rein, weak, White House, Saudi Arabia, reception, labs, prototype, chip, exploratory, declare, skeptical, morass, less power-hungry, neighbor, he, King Abdullah, nomination, ally, powerful, questioned, al-Maliki, violence, plan, programmable, presidential, Barack Obama, array, save, prolong, intentions, mailing list, Washington’s, filing, interconnect, packed, policy, close, sectarian, objectives, doubt, e-mail, tensions, researchers, run, President Bush, transistors, is, gate, iraq, created, U.S., Condoleeza Rice, announced, figured out, stabilize

See what this stew turned into by clicking here.
 

Vitruvian Man

Saturday, January 13, 2007

the last time

you said that
the last time

and you'd probably
say it the next time

about how I am
who I am

about how I should be
the me that you see

the me inside your head
dreaming different dreams

the me inside your head
hugging you hello

instead of the me inside my head
kissing you goodbye


(by Lawrence Lawson)
 

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Have No Fear of Escalation

Lyndon Johnson told the nation
Have no fear of escalation.
I am trying everyone to please.
Though it isn’t really war,
We’re sending 50,000 more
To help save Vietnam from the Vietnamese.



Tom Paxton (1965)
 

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

An Open Letter to the President


Dear President Bush,

Over the past three years and nine months I have watched you pour money and soldiers—our countrymen—into the conflict in Iraq. In the beginning, when I protested the war, you shrugged your shoulders: you didn't seem to care that hundreds of thousands of your employers (American citizens), were standing up, making noise, and demanding that you consider the truths of the situation ... or at least acknowledge them.

Since then, you have spent six to eight billion dollars a month in Iraq (it works out to something like 8.3 million dollars an hour or 200 million dollars a day). More than 3,000 mostly young Americans have been killed—a number I'm sure you'll recognize since you worked so hard to link Saddam Hussein and the tragedy of September 11th. Since invading Iraq about 100,000 citizens—half of them women and children—have been killed as a direct result of our invasion. However noble your crusade, these numbers don't lie. (A few reports estimate the civilian death toll at more than 600,000, but they probably forgot to carry the one.)

Now I find myself, once again, asking you to acknowledge some basic truths. I think you'll sleep better if you do. And who knows, maybe we can save some lives.

Having studied the situation on the ground, as I'm sure you have, you no doubt understand the complex and volatile situation that the Sunni Shia division in Iraq posses. Isn't it frightening that the country can be broken down into three, distinct regions (don't forget the Kurds)? It's almost as if the three regions could exist autonomously, although I'm sure you have your reasons for preventing that from occurring. The United Kingdom did, after all, arbitrarily draw the borders of Iraq after World War I. I suppose you don't want their gin-induced creativity undermined.

Since you are backing the Shiite majority government using our treasure and our ground forces (an interesting choice considering how beholden we are to our Sunni ally Saudi Arabia (Al Qaeda is also Sunni—boy, this can get confusing)), I'm sure you can acknowledge the volatility of the situation. What a pain that we now have to act as referee during the Iraqi Civil War.

As you often remind me whenever you talk to me through my television, you feel a profound loss for each and every soldier killed in Iraq. I'm sure you are proportionally grief stricken for the 20,000 soldiers who have been wounded there.

Considering these basic truths, you're probably beginning to understand that we are losing in Iraq. But I'm confused: I hear you are about to deploy another 21,500 troops into Baghdad and the Anbar province, even though our military leaders and all but one hyper-conservative think tank insists doing so will change nothing—except of course provide more cannon fodder.

I think you may need medication, but there's no time for that now. It seems nothing can prevent you from throwing another handful (proportionally speaking) of soldiers into a brutal situation, a spiraling civil war, and a lost cause. Luckily for you, the American people would tar and feather the Democrats if they actually stopped funding your middle east temper tantrum.

You have my condolences. I know it must be hard for you to realize that your pet war has been wrong all along. I could say "I told you so," but that's not very polite. It must be hard for you to hear that even a majority of the US forces in Iraq think the war is wrong and we should pull out. And I know your Nixonian approval ratings must keep you up at night—even yankees masquerading as cowboys have feelings.

Fortunately for you, God told me to write you this letter. He instructed me to remind you that heaven is pretty full these days, and the souls are too young. He's not happy with what your policy has done and He's getting a little tired of that defensive, swaggered way you talk to the press and the American people. I know that since you have shaped your foreign policy upon conversations with Our Dear Lord in the past, you will take my request most seriously.

God and the American people are united (along with 10 Republican congressional members and almost all of those darn Democrats—not to mention those pesky military leaders): Do not escalate the war in Iraq. Do not throw another 6.8 billion dollars on the fire. Instead, why don't you do something smart for a change: Acknowledge the fact that we have lost this war. Bring our men and women back home, and plug the fiscal hemorrhage in our treasury.

Thank you for your time in reading this.

A Loyal American,


Robert Judge Woerheide
San Diego, CA
 

Monday, January 08, 2007

Aggravated

A new version of "Aggravated," which will appear in my upcoming collection of stories (Traveling Sitting Still), will be published in the new issue of Perigee next Monday. The updated version includes a new ending.

This will be the only opportunity to read the revised story until Traveling Sitting Still is published (expected date: March 2007).
 

Friday, January 05, 2007

Surprise, Surprise

The lower they go, the higher they fly
there's more than one way to play
and I say an eye for an eye
it's been going too far, it's been going too far
for far too long
I wanna set it on fire, I wanna set it on fire
drop the bomb

surprise surprise
the government lies.

It's OK to kill in the name of democracy,
and dictators are swell, if they like the smell
of American money.
It's making me sick, I want no part of it
stop waving that flag
all you idiots bought right into it
who's left holding the bag?

surprise surprise
surprise surprise
the government lies.

This capsized country's sinking fast
I got leaches and landlords and lawyers
crawling all over my ass.
We've been playing along and they've been playing the song
that we wanted to hear,
but the melody's meaningless
it's wasted on my ears

surprise surprise
surprise surprise
surprise surprise
the government lies.



Cop Shoot Cop, "Surprise, Surprise"
 

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Freaks of Nature

"We are—all of us—freaks of nature. We don't generally see ourselves this way, of course. After all, being human, what could be more ordinary than a human being? But it turns out that our personal (and biased) impressions that we are unremarkable simply don't stand up against the plain objective facts. The way we walk, for example, teetering on long, paired stilts of articulated bones, is unique among mammals, and as preposterous in its way as elephant trunks and platypus feet. We also communicate by tossing oddly intricate noises at one another, which somehow carry complex packages of feeling, thought, and information. We share and understand these sounds as if they were scents drifting on the wind, and our minds special noses that sniff the fragrance of their meaning. Using them we are able to change one another's minds, even bring one another to tears. We also invent, to the point of being dangerous, incessantly bending the things, living and otherwise, around us to our own ends. Because of this habit, we have, for better or worse, created national economies, erected the pyramids of Giza and Chichen Itza, fashioned exquisite art, sculpture, and music, invented the steam engine, moon rockets, the digital computer, stealth bombers, and "weaponized" diseases. Nothing on the planted seems to escape our urge to remake it. These days we are even tailoring genes to remake ourselves."

Excerpt from Thumbs, Toes, and Tears: And Other Traits That Make Us Human, by Chip Walter.
 

A Good Day

It is a good day for America. Congratulations, Madame Speaker.
 

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Thesis

I have recently become interested in two truths: The miracle of human evolution and the uniquely destructive nature of the human animal. How do we reconcile these two realities? I will attempt to explore this issue in the coming months, and some of my explorations (as I research these topics) will be posted on Pict Grooving.

The migration of mankind from Africa to Australia and (later) Europe, Asia, and the Americas is an incredible story. The survival of Homo sapiens while so many other hominids have gone extinct speaks, in Darwinian terms, to our capacity for adaptation ("It is not the strongest of a species that survive, but those most adaptive to change," Darwin wrote).

The similarity of the 20th and 21st century human population explosion to the frenetic mitosis of cancer cells places our world and our species in a precarious position. Our ability to kill simply for pleasure is unprecedented in the natural world, and our simple-minded tendency to destroy our ecosystem speaks to an infancy in evolutionary terms.

Will we, like Homo erectus or Australopithecus before him, soon go extinct? The evidence seems, frighteningly, to suggest that. How will our unique abilities—such as the ability to create art for art's sake, or our tendency to destroy that which sustains us—save or doom us.
 

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Greatness in the Greater

Monday, January 01, 2007

Enough is Enough

The New Year greets us with a grim body count in Iraq. As of this writing, 3,002 mostly young Americans have been killed during the Iraq war—a war which we are clearly losing.

It is interesting, from an intellectual standpoint, to be on the losing end of a war. Particularly when your country is the most powerful—and therefore the most dangerous—nation. Then I remember the three thousand of my countrymen who have died for this war and I forget about being intellectual. I think about their children, their hopes and dreams, their wives and husbands and parents—I think about all the moments of life both great and small which have been denied them. I think about the cause for which they have died.

As I become more convinced that we should simply leave, that we should pull out and let the ongoing civil war settle itself out just as our glorified Civil War was allowed to do, I wonder why the President doesn't see the writing on the wall.

3,002.

I wonder why, when more of our soldiers disapprove of this war than approve of it (as revealed in a recent, unprecedented Army poll), we don't admit the obvious and let the Iraqis clean up the mess we've made. I seem to remember something about self determination from civics class. Perhaps the Iraq people have their own manifest destiny. Perhaps we are mucking up the works. It seems painfully obvious to me that we are.

And if we choose to remain stubborn—or if we neglect to demand our elected officials remain true to the constitution and therefore to the people who elect them, to the people by whom they are employed—you and I will be responsible for the death of the 3,003 soldier ... and all the hundreds or thousands who will follow if this mistaken war continues.